DIY BGA and Solderless Multilayer PCB Tests
October 23, 2020

This test used laser-drilled Avery sticker masks and conductive ink to explore a solderless 0.4 mm pitch BGA / multilayer-PCB process.

The reported preliminary result was less than 1 ohm via resistance and more than 100 megaohm inter-via isolation after adding a copper-wire puncture step to help trapped air escape from ink-filled holes.

Process noteOriginally posted 2020-10-23; expanded here around the process and measured result.

Related: The Missing Maker Fab

Article focus: 0.4 mm pitch BGA holes, laser-drilled masks, conductive ink, bubble removal, via resistance, and inter-via isolation.

The Test

The experiment was a solderless interconnect process for dense BGA-style contact geometry. The target pitch was 0.4 mm. The process used laser-drilled adhesive masks and CircuitScribe conductive ink.

The important measurement was electrical, not decorative: preliminary tests reached less than 1 ohm via resistance and more than 100 megaohm inter-via isolation.

Process Steps

  1. Laminate pink Avery Neon 5975 stickers for laser drilling.
  2. Laser-drill the BGA holes in the laminated Avery mask using a 3 W engraver at 0.050 mm per pixel.
  3. Stick the laminated Avery mask to the BGA.
  4. Laser-drill the same BGA-hole pattern in a second non-laminated Avery sheet to make the conductive-ink mask.
  5. Precisely align the holes and place the non-laminated mask on top of the laminated one.
  6. Apply CircuitScribe conductive ink to each hole while watching for trapped air and capillary effects.
  7. Puncture each ink-filled hole with a small copper wire to release trapped air and improve drying. Keep the chip on a firm surface so the ink is not pulled sideways between holes.
  8. Remove the non-laminated mask before the ink on top of that mask becomes part of the structure.

What The Step Fixed

The copper-wire puncture step was the useful change. It gave trapped air a path out of the ink-filled vias and reduced the chance that bubbles or incomplete fill would dominate the electrical result.

The tradeoff is process sensitivity: alignment, surface support, ink drying, and capillary behavior matter at this pitch.