Original Post

I have read and completely understood Sabine's paper she wrote in collaboration with Palmer in 2019, "Rethinking Superdeterminism."

I feel that many-worlds, and consciousness as quantum luck makes more sense than fractal spiral correlations. I like the idea of Superdeterminism a lot by many reasons (as a computer scientist), but reject it because many-worlds and quantum luck help me to explain my personal circumstances in life, and the reasons why we can't make AIs, as Erik Larson explains in his book.

I also think that Sabine and Wolfram believe in the same picture of reality, although Stephen Wolfram's position overlaps with Carroll's.

I wish Sean Carroll and Carlo Rovelli were closer friends, met with Erik and Federico Faggin.

Relational interpretation does require reconciliation with many-worlds ASAP, under the simple assumption that all quantum physics results are pixels drawn on the surface of reality, which is inherently spiritual in its nature.

#idealism